http://blogs.sackheads.org/tacacsplus Casting Light on the Dark Art of TACACS+ Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:20:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 http://blogs.sackheads.org/tacacsplus/2008/11/04/cisco-wireless-control-system/#comment-19 Webs Wed, 10 Dec 2008 16:02:24 +0000 http://blogs.sackheads.org/tacacsplus/?p=23#comment-19 Try following <a href="http://www.ciscosystems.com/en/US/tech/tk722/tk809/technologies_tech_note09186a0080851f7c.shtml" rel="nofollow">this site from Cisco for getting WCS on TACACS</a>. This is what I did in our enterprise environment and we now have TACACS running on everything. Try following this site from Cisco for getting WCS on TACACS. This is what I did in our enterprise environment and we now have TACACS running on everything.

]]> http://blogs.sackheads.org/tacacsplus/2008/11/04/cisco-wireless-control-system/#comment-5 Marius B Fri, 28 Nov 2008 11:44:43 +0000 http://blogs.sackheads.org/tacacsplus/?p=23#comment-5 Setup that works on WLS, Set prefered in "Authentication Type" in wcs <code> user = Luser { pap = cleartext "test" chap = cleartext "test" service = Wireless-WCS { role0=Admin role1=SuperUsers role2=ConfigManager role3=SystemMonitoring task0="Monitor Controllers } } </code> Setup that works on WLS, Set prefered in “Authentication Type” in wcs

user = Luser {
pap = cleartext "test"
chap = cleartext "test"
service = Wireless-WCS {
role0=Admin
role1=SuperUsers
role2=ConfigManager
role3=SystemMonitoring
task0="Monitor Controllers
}
}


]]> http://blogs.sackheads.org/tacacsplus/2008/11/04/cisco-wireless-control-system/#comment-4 Marius B Fri, 28 Nov 2008 10:43:26 +0000 http://blogs.sackheads.org/tacacsplus/?p=23#comment-4 This does works for WLC's (Wireless Lan Controlers) authenticating against tac_plus, It does NOT work for WLS (Wireless Contorl Server) authenticating against tac_plus.. WLS seams to need a protocol not supported by tac_plus. This does works for WLC’s (Wireless Lan Controlers) authenticating against tac_plus,
It does NOT work for WLS (Wireless Contorl Server) authenticating against tac_plus..
WLS seams to need a protocol not supported by tac_plus.

]]>